Trade Journal

PatternLedger is a research desk for US and Hong Kong equities. Review ranked pattern signals, open symbol research pages, and connect each setup to past outcomes from today’s scanner rules.

US & HK Equities Ranked Pattern Signals Backtest Evidence

Workspace Tools

Signal Desk Main scanner board for ranked US and HK pattern signals. Top Trades Ranked composite trade desk across AI-reviewed, liquidity, trend, contrarian, market, buy, and sell candidates. AI Ticker Review On-demand AI chart read for any US or HK ticker using scanner pattern context. Trade Journal Tracked setups, trade plans, outcomes, and follow-through checks. Backtests Past performance for signals produced by today’s scanner rules. Pattern Reference Scanner rules, pattern definitions, scoring logic, and evidence labels.

AI Trades 4.90% 7 trades | avg 0.70%
1 open | 6 closed

AIAI Trades

Daily and weekly system recommendations

AI Trade Journal 4.90% 7 trades | avg 0.70%
1 open | 6 closed

Daily AI Trades 16.97% 1 trades | avg 16.97%
0 open | 1 closed

Weekly AI Trades -12.07% 6 trades | avg -2.01%
1 open | 5 closed

AI Trades Net P&L (%) Over Time

Equal-weight returns for ai trades using stored closes and the journal's transaction-cost treatment.

AI Recommendations 4.90%

TimeBy Timeframe

AI Trades across AI-recommended trades

Daily Trades 16.97% 1 trades | avg 16.97%
0 open | 1 closed

Weekly Trades -12.07% 6 trades | avg -2.01%
1 open | 5 closed

Daily vs Weekly AI Trades Net P&L (%)

AI Trades grouped by primary timeframe, using the same cumulative return treatment as the source panel.

Daily Trades 16.97% Weekly Trades -12.07%

MarketBy Market

AI Trades across AI-recommended trades

US Trades -6.14% 5 trades | avg -1.23%
1 open | 4 closed

HK Trades 11.04% 2 trades | avg 5.52%
0 open | 2 closed

US vs HK AI Trades Net P&L (%)

AI Trades grouped by market, using the same cumulative return treatment as the source panel.

US Trades -6.14% HK Trades 11.04%

Latest 5 Trades

Most recent activity within ai trades.

Activity	Source	Trade	Side	Trade State	Setup	Entry	Current / Exit	P/L / MTM
2026-07-23	AI	US JMUB	Buy	Closed	Weekly · Rising Support	50.35	49.62 Exit	-1.65% P/L
2026-07-20	AI	US OVLY	Buy	Closed	Weekly · Rising Support	33.80	31.77 Exit	-6.21% P/L
2026-07-17	AI	US NATH	Buy	Closed	Weekly · Rising Support	102.20	99.70 Exit	-2.65% P/L
2026-07-15	AI	HK 6198-OL	Sell	Closed	Weekly · Rising Support	6.28	6.64 Exit	-5.93% P/L
2026-07-14	AI	US LVHI	Buy	Closed	Weekly · Rising Support	40.70	41.80 Exit	2.50% P/L

System Recommendations

All AI-Recommended Trades

Open & Planned AI Trades

Trade	Trade State	Setup	AI Board	Adj. Score	Holding Period	Entry Date	Entry Price	Stop Loss	Profit Take	Current / Closed Price	P/L / MTM
US FLSP LONG AI verdict acceptable Research Page External Chart	Open TP1 Pending 28.55 not hit yet TP2 Pending 29.01 not hit yet	Weekly Rising Support	Open Board 2026-06-26	96.48	2-8 weeks	2026-06-29	27.55	26.82	TP1 28.55 TP2 29.01	28.12	MTM 1.87% net of estimated round-trip costs cost 0.10%/side
Plan Why: Weekly Rising Support AI board candidate from 2026-06-26 with adjusted score 96.48. How: LONG uses the actual entry around 27.55; stop loss 26.82 is the stored invalidation level and should sit beyond support/resistance when that structure is available; first profit take 28.55; second target 29.01 is the journal target after checking that the target is far enough from entry compared with the stop-loss risk, unless stronger chart structure supports the stored levels. Holding window: 2-8 weeks. Invalidation from the AI review: Reject the long thesis if price closes below 26.93 on the weekly/daily structure, or if a breakout attempt above 28.03-28.20 fails and quickly closes back into the range with weak follow-through. Reward/risk to the first target is 1.37:1. Rationale The chart does support a long candidate, but only moderately. The strongest evidence is structural: the weekly uptrend is intact, rising support has been respected multiple times, and price remains above key moving averages with no obvious breakdown. That said, this is not a clean open-air continuation. Price is pressing into a nearby resistance cluster from the daily/weekly range box, momentum confirmation is only partial, and volume is not expanding. Visually this looks tradable on a pullback into support or on a decisive breakout above resistance, but at the current location it is not strong enough to upgrade aggressively. Therefore the setup is acceptable rather than strong. Journal Note Auto-recorded: Acceptable/Strong AI review with adjusted score >= 95 and valid trade plan.

Closed AI Trades

Trade	Trade State	Setup	AI Board	Adj. Score	Holding Period	Entry Date	Entry Price	Stop Loss	Profit Take	Current / Closed Price	P/L / MTM
HK 6198-OL SHORT AI verdict acceptable Research Page External Chart	Closed Stop hit TP1 Pending 5.81 not hit yet TP2 Pending 5.51 not hit yet Stop Hit 2026-07-15 @ 6.64	Weekly Rising Support	Open Board 2026-07-11	97.32	days to 2 weeks	2026-07-13	6.28	6.64	TP1 5.81 TP2 5.51	6.64 Closed at 6.64	P/L -5.93% net of estimated round-trip costs cost 0.10%/side
Plan Why: Weekly Rising Support AI board candidate from 2026-07-11 with adjusted score 97.32. How: SHORT uses the actual entry around 6.28; stop loss 6.64 is the stored invalidation level and should sit beyond support/resistance when that structure is available; first profit take 5.81; second target 5.51 is the journal target after checking that the target is far enough from entry compared with the stop-loss risk, unless stronger chart structure supports the stored levels. Holding window: days to 2 weeks. Invalidation from the AI review: A decisive weekly reclaim back above roughly 6.52-6.58, or a strong close back through the broken rising-support line, would negate the bearish breakdown and invalidate the short. Reward/risk to the first target is 1.31:1. Rationale The chart visually supports the short thesis: weekly support has broken, the prior uptrend has lost structure, and the daily timeframe is showing a bearish flag breakdown under declining moving averages. The setup is tradable, but not exceptional because price is already near immediate support and is stretched below the weekly Bollinger lower band, so a bounce/retest is plausible. The bearish structure is coherent enough for an acceptable-grade short, with a stop above the broken support/retest zone and targets at the next visible weekly support shelves. Journal Note Auto-recorded: Acceptable/Strong AI review with adjusted score >= 95 and valid risk-normalized trade plan. TP1 is at least 1R and TP2 is at least 2R when needed.
US JMUB LONG AI verdict acceptable Research Page External Chart	Closed Stop hit TP1 Pending 51.10 not hit yet TP2 Pending 51.81 not hit yet Stop Hit 2026-07-23 @ 49.62	Weekly Rising Support	Open Board 2026-06-26	95.30	days to a few weeks	2026-06-29	50.35	49.62	TP1 51.10 TP2 51.81	49.62 Closed at 49.62	P/L -1.65% net of estimated round-trip costs cost 0.10%/side
Plan Why: Weekly Rising Support AI board candidate from 2026-06-26 with adjusted score 95.30. How: LONG uses the actual entry around 50.35; stop loss 49.62 is the stored invalidation level and should sit beyond support/resistance when that structure is available; first profit take 51.10; second target 51.81 is the journal target after checking that the target is far enough from entry compared with the stop-loss risk, unless stronger chart structure supports the stored levels. Holding window: days to a few weeks. Invalidation from the AI review: Weekly close back below 49.62, or a failed retest that loses the 49.9-49.7 support shelf and closes back into the lower half of the weekly range. Reward/risk to the first target is 1.03:1. Rationale The chart supports a long bias, but only moderately. The strongest evidence is the higher-timeframe structure: rising weekly support, constructive MA stacking, and repeated defense of the upper-49s area. The daily chart also shows orderly recovery and trend alignment. However, the setup is not clean enough for a strong upgrade because price remains inside a visible weekly range with nearby overhead resistance, weekly MACD confirmation is incomplete, and the latest daily push is somewhat stretched above the upper Bollinger Band without strong volume expansion. That makes this a tradable continuation/range-support long, but not an exceptional breakout-quality chart. Journal Note Auto-recorded: Acceptable/Strong AI review with adjusted score >= 95 and valid trade plan.
US NATH LONG AI verdict acceptable Research Page External Chart	Closed Stop hit TP1 Pending 107.50 not hit yet TP2 Pending 107.50 not hit yet Stop Hit 2026-07-17 @ 99.70	Weekly Rising Support	Open Board 2026-06-26	95.49	days to several weeks	2026-06-29	102.20	99.70	TP1 107.50 TP2 107.50	99.70 Closed at 99.70	P/L -2.65% net of estimated round-trip costs cost 0.10%/side
Plan Why: Weekly Rising Support AI board candidate from 2026-06-26 with adjusted score 95.49. How: LONG uses the actual entry around 102.20; stop loss 99.70 is the stored invalidation level and should sit beyond support/resistance when that structure is available; first profit take 107.50; second target 107.50 is the journal target after checking that the target is far enough from entry compared with the stop-loss risk, unless stronger chart structure supports the stored levels. Holding window: days to several weeks. Invalidation from the AI review: Reject the long thesis if price closes back below the 100-101 support cluster and especially if it breaks below about 99.7, which would lose both the recent daily base and the nearby weekly support context. Reward/risk to the first target is 2.12:1. Rationale The chart does support a long bias, but more as a decent continuation/setup-on-support than as a standout breakout. The weekly rising support is real and price remains above key moving averages, which is the main positive. The daily chart also shows support at the 100/200 MA zone and a stable base around 100-102. However, the structure is somewhat compressed and capped by nearby overhead supply, and the weekly engulfing signal is less meaningful than the rule score suggests because it occurs inside a sideways area with limited separation. This is tradable if entered close to support with a clean stop below the recent base, but it is not clean enough to upgrade to strong without a decisive breakout above nearby resistance. Journal Note Auto-recorded: Acceptable/Strong AI review with adjusted score >= 95 and valid trade plan.
US OVLY LONG AI verdict acceptable Research Page External Chart	Closed Stop gap TP1 Pending 36.00 not hit yet TP2 Pending 36.30 not hit yet Stop Hit 2026-07-20 @ 31.77	Weekly Rising Support	Open Board 2026-06-26	96.16	1-6 weeks	2026-06-29	33.80	32.55	TP1 36.00 TP2 36.30	31.77 Closed at 31.77	P/L -6.21% net of estimated round-trip costs cost 0.10%/side
Plan Why: Weekly Rising Support AI board candidate from 2026-06-26 with adjusted score 96.16. How: LONG uses the actual entry around 33.80; stop loss 32.55 is the stored invalidation level and should sit beyond support/resistance when that structure is available; first profit take 36.00; second target 36.30 is the journal target after checking that the target is far enough from entry compared with the stop-loss risk, unless stronger chart structure supports the stored levels. Holding window: 1-6 weeks. Invalidation from the AI review: Reject the long thesis on a decisive daily close below 32.7, especially if price also loses the 100-day MA and the weekly rising-support area; a weekly close below about 32.5 would be stronger invalidation. Reward/risk to the first target is 1.76:1. Rationale This is a tradable but not exceptional long. The main positive is the weekly market structure: higher lows, intact rising support, and price above key moving averages. The support area around 32.7-33.0 has been accepted multiple times and the latest daily response came with stronger volume, which gives the setup a legitimate technical base. That said, the chart is not especially clean on the daily timeframe. Momentum is mixed rather than strongly confirming, the triple-bottom interpretation is loose, and there is obvious nearby resistance around 35.0. So the visual evidence supports the rule-based candidate enough to keep it alive, but not enough to upgrade it materially. Best treated as a support-hold continuation attempt rather than a high-conviction breakout. Journal Note Auto-recorded: Acceptable/Strong AI review with adjusted score >= 95 and valid trade plan.
US LVHI LONG AI verdict acceptable Research Page External Chart	Closed Target hit TP1 Hit 2026-07-14 @ 41.80 TP2 Hit 2026-07-14 @ 41.80	Weekly Rising Support	Open Board 2026-06-26	97.16	days to 2-4 weeks	2026-06-29	40.70	40.15	TP1 41.80 TP2 41.80	41.80 Closed at 41.80	P/L 2.50% net of estimated round-trip costs cost 0.10%/side
Plan Why: Weekly Rising Support AI board candidate from 2026-06-26 with adjusted score 97.16. How: LONG uses the actual entry around 40.70; stop loss 40.15 is the stored invalidation level and should sit beyond support/resistance when that structure is available; first profit take 41.80; second target 41.80 is the journal target after checking that the target is far enough from entry compared with the stop-loss risk, unless stronger chart structure supports the stored levels. Holding window: days to 2-4 weeks. Invalidation from the AI review: Reject the long thesis on a daily close below 40.15, especially if price loses the 100-day MA/support zone and closes back under the recent box support with weak follow-through from buyers. Reward/risk to the first target is 2.00:1. Rationale The long setup is visually supported, but only moderately. The best evidence is the clean weekly rising support and the fact that daily price is still holding above rising longer-term moving averages. That said, the current daily structure is more of a sideways consolidation sitting on support than a strong continuation launch. Momentum and volume do not provide a strong upgrade, and the chart shows crowded resistance just overhead. So this is tradable as a support-respect long with a tight invalidation, but it is not an especially powerful or clean breakout-quality setup. Journal Note Auto-recorded: Acceptable/Strong AI review with adjusted score >= 95 and valid trade plan.
HK 0968 SHORT AI verdict acceptable Research Page External Chart	Closed Target hit TP1 Hit 2026-06-23 @ 2.10 TP2 Hit 2026-06-24 @ 1.93	Daily Descending Channel	Open Board 2026-06-18	98.49	daily to 1-3 weeks	2026-06-22	2.33	2.53	TP1 2.10 TP2 1.93	1.93 Closed at 1.93	P/L 16.97% net of estimated round-trip costs cost 0.10%/side
Plan Why: Daily Descending Channel AI board candidate from 2026-06-18 with adjusted score 98.49. How: SHORT uses the actual entry around 2.33; stop loss 2.53 is the stored invalidation level and should sit beyond support/resistance when that structure is available; first profit take 2.10; second target 1.93 is the journal target after checking that the target is far enough from entry compared with the stop-loss risk, unless stronger chart structure supports the stored levels. Holding window: daily to 1-3 weeks. Invalidation from the AI review: Invalidate if price reclaims the recent flag/channel resistance and closes back above the 20-day average area near 2.56, especially if that move comes with strong upside follow-through. Reward/risk to the first target is 1.15:1. Rationale The chart visually supports the bearish candidate: the daily and weekly trends are down, price remains below key moving averages, and the descending channel/bear-flag breakdown are consistent with continuation lower. The main downgrade from 'strong' is that the setup is somewhat extended and sitting near support/lower-band territory, which raises mean-reversion risk and caps immediate reward. So this is tradable, but not an ideal late-entry short. Journal Note Auto-recorded: Acceptable/Strong AI review with adjusted score >= 95 and valid trade plan.